<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/6589715?origin\x3dhttp://deskoh91.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

dEsKOh91 VX

Chronicles of the world from my perspective.

Inbox & Life

Monday, September 03, 2007


I dont really want to dedicate the first post under the VX branding to this but well... this just came to me. I was digging through a senior's blog just now when I came across the term Knismolagnia.

bet many of you dont know what it means. I didnt till a while ago too. it is another term for arousal from tickling. thus, I am reminded of an accuastion this morning of me committing statutory rape for tickling a 14 year old.

hey, all I did was tickle the alleged victim in a manner totally unrelated to any form of sexual connotation.

I went to do some searching. turns out there are laws at 12, 14 and 16 years old. what the heck. oh, all laws below dont apply to guys. hmph. sexist.

==

1) The legal age of consent for sexual activity is sixteen (16). BUT

2) A man is said to commit 'rape' who, except in the case hereinafter, has sexual intercourse with a woman with or without consent, when she is under fourteen (14) years of age.', BUT

3) A consent is not a consentas as intended by any section of this code if the consent is given by a person who is under twelve (12) years of age.

==

first, I did not have sexual intercourse. definitely. I dont want to be wronged for such a huge crime.

second, if I did not even have sexual intercourse, it is even more unlikely I am doing it "with or without consent".

third, provided the said victim has Knismolagnia, what the heck would I be prosecuted under? the first or the second?

food for thought indeed. lol.

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knismolagnia
http://www.interpol.int/Public/Children/SexualAbuse/NationalLaws/csaSingapore.asp
posted by Desmond, 10:54 PM